MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410839422 · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.05.035

Advancements in Novel Therapeutics for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

2025· article· en· W4410839422 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua S. Bernstein, Gordon Sussman, Helena Pité, Jonathan A. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChronic urticariaIntensive care medicineMEDLINEDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic urticaria (CU) is defined by pruritic wheals with or without angioedema, associated with severe itch, which persist for greater than 6 weeks. Lesions move from one part of the body to another and generally are evanescent, lasting less than 24 hours. The global prevalence of the disease ranges from 0.5% to 5% and is correlated with an annual economic burden of over $200 million in the United States. Chronic urticaria can be further divided into chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria. Whereas chronic spontaneous urticaria has no identifiable trigger, chronic inducible urticaria can be provoked by both physical and nonphysical stimuli. As many as 7% to 30% of patients with CU can have both types. Mast cells are the major effector cells in the pathogenesis of CU. When activated, mast cells characteristically release bioactive mediators including histamine that bind to specific receptors causing vasodilation and extravasation of fluid from the blood vasculature. This causes the characteristic wheals and itch. However, the pathophysiology of CU is much more complex, involving many mast cell surface receptors, cytokines, and cell activation pathways that are targets for many of the currently available and investigational therapies. Studies have demonstrated that CU causes a significant amount of distress and disruption to patients' daily lives that can be evaluated using validated patient-reported outcomes measures. In this review, we review CU epidemiology, pathophysiology, subtypes, and diagnosis and discuss current and novel therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In PracticeSame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207