MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410840195 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03068-7

Association between post-stroke cognitive impairment and gut microbiota in patients with ischemic stroke

2025· article· en· W4410840195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yi-Chen Hsieh, Po-Ya Chang, Yuling Li, Sung‐Chun Tang, Jiann‐Shing Jeng, Chaur‐Jong Hu, Hung‐Yi Chiou

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTaipei Medical UniversityNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Internal medicineGut floraConfoundingImmunologyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than half of stroke survivors have post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). The role of gut microbiota, which can communicate with the brain through the gut-brain axis and affect inflammation, has been receiving increased attention. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association of PSCI, gut microbiota, and inflammatory markers. Patients with first ischemic stroke and complete 3-month and 1-year follow-up data were included and divided into PSCI and non-PSCI groups according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at the above time points. PSCI was defined as having a MoCA less than 23 at either 3 months or 1 year, or a decrease of more than 2 points at both time points. Gut microbiota was assessed by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and Next Generation Sequencing analysis. The inflammatory markers included interleukins (ILs), eotaxin, G-CSF, TNF-α, IFNγ, sCD40L, and MCP-1. There were 95 ischemic stroke patients (mean age, 60.5 ± 12.1 years; male, 68.4%), including 30 with PSCI and 65 with non-PSCI. In gut microbiota analysis, the PSCI group had a higher abundance of Bacteroidaceae and Clostridiaceae, and the non-PSCI group had a higher abundance of Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Oscillibacter, and Faecalibacterium. Ruminococcaceae family under the Oscillospirales order remains significantly different in the two groups in logistic regression model adjusting confounding variables (p = 0.044). In an analysis of inflammatory markers, the plasma levels of eotaxin (p = 0.041) and IL-12p40 (p = 0.031) were significantly higher in the PSCI group than those in the non-PSCI group, and the plasma level of eotaxin was significantly positively correlated with the amount of Clostridiaceae (rho = 0.389, p = 0.045). The study found that PSCI was associated with certain gut microbiota, and these gut microbiotas correlated with the pro-inflammatory marker eotaxin. This suggests that gut microbiota might play a role in the development of cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→