MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410840309 · doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2025.107811

Discrimination of carbonatite and Mississippi Valley-type deposits by partial least squares-discriminant analysis of trace elements and Mg isotope compositions in dolomite

2025· article· en· W4410840309 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daisuke Araoka, Keita Itano, George J. Simandl, S J Paradis, Toshihiro Yoshimura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geochemical Exploration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of VictoriaRoyal British Columbia Museum
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsDolomiteCarbonatiteGeologyGeochemistryLinear discriminant analysisTRACE (psycholinguistics)MineralogyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbonatite-related rare earth element (REE), Nb, fluorite, and phosphate deposits and Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) deposits containing Zn, Pb, Ag, and Ge are increasingly important sources of critical metals and minerals. Geochemical classification of carbonatite-related and MVT deposits using chemical compositions of dolomite, the most common gangue mineral in such deposits, is potentially useful for tracing the deposit types and assisting in mineral exploration. Here, we studied variations in elemental contents (42 elements) and δ 26 Mg of dolomite from deposits in the eastern Canadian Cordillera, where carbonatite-related and MVT deposits coexist, to examine its usefulness for geochemical discrimination. Our dataset showed systematic differences between carbonatite and MVT deposits: dolomites from carbonatites were enriched in Fe, Ga, Sr, As, Ba, REEs, and Th and had high δ 26 Mg values, whereas dolomites from MVT deposits were enriched in Zn and Pb, but there were obvious overlaps. We developed an accurate discrimination model by performing a partial least squares regression-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) that considered all variables simultaneously. The results of PLS-DA showed that two components were sufficient for accurate classification of dolomites from the two deposit types in the study area in comparison with the results of principal component analysis and liner discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA). The δ 26 Mg, Sr/Mg, Zn/Mg, Ba/Mg, and Pb/Mg yielded the highest variable importance on projection (VIP) scores, which is consistent with the geochemical parameters expected from previous studies on carbonatites and MVT deposits. Furthermore, we applied the developed discrimination model to a dataset of dolomite from other deposit (Rock Canyon Creek deposit) and unmineralized dolomite from the host rocks. The dolomites from the Rock Canyon Creek deposit were classified as carbonatite-related deposits, consistent with recent research, although their elemental signatures differ greatly from those of typical carbonatite-related deposits. The unmineralized dolomite plotted separately from the mineralized dolomite samples in the PLS-DA score plots. Our results suggest that PLS-DA score plots of dolomite chemistry are useful for classifying deposit types and probably applicable to exploration for critical metals and minerals associated with carbonatite-related and MVT deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geochemical ExplorationSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207