MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410843450 · doi:10.1007/s10592-025-01706-1

Conservation genetics of the threatened wetland plant Eriocaulon nudicuspe: application of GRAS-Di sequencing technology and implications for restoration

2025· article· en· W4410843450 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ikuyo Saeki, Akira S. Hirao

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsThreatened speciesBiologyEndangered speciesBiodiversityWetlandConservation geneticsBiodiversity conservationEcologyConservation-dependent speciesNear-threatened speciesGeneticsMicrosatelliteGeneHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Eriocaulon nudicuspe is a threatened plant species distributed at discrete seepage wetlands in Central Honshu, Japan. These wetlands have been present over a million years and functioned as refugia during the glacial periods. The species is an endemic of the wetland ecosystems, but its natural habitats are fragmented by land development. We aimed to identify the genetic structure and diversity of E. nudicuspe and to assess the implications for conservation. We performed Genotyping by Random Amplicon Sequencing-Direct (GRAS-Di) and selected 2349 SNPs that were genotyped in 102 individuals from 14 natural and 2 human-established populations. Genetic population structure analyses identified four genetic groups: eastern, northern central, southern central, and western. Demographic modelling suggested that first three groups (eastern, central, and western) simultaneously diverged in prehistoric times, followed by the central group diverging into northern and southern groups. Observed heterozygosity was lower in the populations at the edge of the species’ distribution than in the others, probably due to foundation effects associated with the limitation of suitable habitats. The human-established populations had similar genetic diversity and composition to those of the geographically closest natural populations, indicating a low risk of outbreeding depression or genetic bottleneck. We propose four major conservation units, which can be useful for the development of strategies for ex-situ conservation and genetic management of restoration. Although conservation of remnant natural populations should be prioritized, establishing new populations with adequate genetic management seems an effective option to restore connectivity between wetlands isolated by urbanization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation GeneticsSame topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsFrench-language works237,207