MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410845279 · doi:10.1089/respcare.12673

Longitudinal Characterization of Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

2025· article· en· W4410845279 on OpenAlexaff
Candelaria de Haro, Alba Xifra‐Porxas, Montserrat Batlle, Leonardo Sarlabous, Verónica Santos-Pulpón, Víctor Manuel Mora Cuesta, Francesc Suñol, Gemma Gomà, J. Estela, Carlés Subirá, Josefina López‐Aguilar, Sol Fernández‐Gonzalo, Marta Godoy-González, Rafael Fernández, Rudys Magrans, Irene Telías, Oriol Roca, Laurent Brochard, Lluís Blanch

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Regional Development FundInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIFundació la Marató de TV3Generalitat de CatalunyaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCentres de Recerca de Catalunya
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineAcute respiratory failureEmergency medicineInternal medicineMechanical ventilation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We sought to analyze the prevalence of patient-ventilator asynchronies in subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure because of COVID-19 ARDS and their association with clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a two-center observational cohort study using prospectively collected real-world data. We included adult subjects with COVID-19 ARDS who required mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. We analyzed the prevalence, characteristics, and clusters of the following patient-ventilator asynchronies detected using dedicated software on continuous respiratory recordings obtained from ventilators over the duration of mechanical ventilation (Better Care, Sabadell, Spain): double triggering, ineffective efforts (IE), and reverse triggering with and without breath-stacking (BS). The outcome measures evaluated were duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and ICU mortality. Results: We analyzed 82 subjects with COVID-19 ARDS. Over the complete duration of mechanical ventilation, the most frequent asynchronies and related clusters were reverse triggering without BS (0.72% of breaths [interquartile range (IQR), 0.17–3.07]) and 4.6 clusters/d [IQR, 2.0–8.1] and double triggering (0.44% of breaths [IQR, 0.19–0.80]) and 4.6 clusters/d [IQR, 2.1–7.3]. The use of neuromuscular blockers was associated with a lower prevalence of double triggering and IE, but reverse triggering was not significantly reduced. Double triggering significantly increased with longer mechanical ventilation time, whereas reverse trigger significantly decreased during this period. Double triggering and clusters of double triggering were independently associated with longer mechanical ventilation duration and better ICU survival, whereas clusters of reverse triggering with BS were associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. Conclusions: Reverse triggering was the most prevalent asynchrony in subjects with ARDS COVID-19, decreased over time, and was followed by double triggering. Survivors had a higher prevalence of double triggering and clusters of double triggering, mostly occurring during spontaneous modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207