MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410845739 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.27.25328449

Respiratory Exacerbations Increase with Chronic PM <sub>2.5</sub> Exposure in Current and Former Smokers

2025· preprint· en· W4410845739 on OpenAlexaff
James Crooks, Zhongying Wang, Morteza Karimzadeh, Min Hyung Ryu, Elizabeth A. Regan

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSunovionGlaxoSmithKlineCOPD FoundationGenentechAstraZenecaPfizer
KeywordsRespiratory systemCurrent (fluid)MedicineIntensive care medicineEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Short-term exposure to fine particulates (PM 2.5 ) transiently increases the risk of respiratory exacerbations, but the contribution of chronic, long-term particulate exposure to respiratory exacerbations is poorly defined. Objectives To assess long-term effects of PM 2.5 exposure on risk of severe respiratory exacerbations. Methods A longitudinal cohort of current and former smokers with and without COPD were surveyed every six months for severe exacerbation events. PM 2.5 concentrations at participant addresses were estimated using satellite, reanalysis, and ground-based monitoring data sources. Measurements and Main Results The relative risk of severe exacerbation increased by a factor of 1.516 (CI: 1.226, 1.873; p = 0.00012) for every 10 μg/m 3 increase in long-term PM 2.5 exposure across all participants. The effect in the non-COPD participants was greater, with a relative risk of 2.639 (CI: 1.840, 3.756; p<0.0001). Significant effect modifiers with greater effect of PM 2.5 , included prior exacerbations, female sex, and neighborhood characteristics and as well as smoking status, white race, disease severity, asthma diagnosis, and age at enrollment. Significant positive associations for PM 2.5 on exacerbations were identified at levels below the EPA primary annual standard for PM 2.5 of 9.0 μg/m 3 . Conclusions Persistent exposure to fine particulates is a significant risk factor for severe respiratory exacerbations in current and former smokers, and in patients with or at risk of COPD. The effect of fine particulates on the risk of severe exacerbations appears to be greater in those current and former smokers without COPD. The EPA annual PM 2.5 standard may be inadequate to prevent ongoing lung injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→