MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410849490 · doi:10.2196/65238

Determinants of Patient Satisfaction With Telemental Health Services in Germany: Representative Cross-Sectional Postpandemic Survey Study

2025· article· en· W4410849490 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ariana Neumann, Hans‐Helmut König, André Hajek

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Mental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemedicineMental healthPatient satisfactionPsychosocialTelepsychiatryMedicinePsychological interventionCross-sectional studyTelehealthFamily medicineHealth careNursingPsychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Increasing patient satisfaction with telemental health services is crucial for promoting widespread implementation and ensuring consistent utilization rates in the future, where these services could be a beneficial addition to routine mental health care. Nevertheless, knowledge regarding determinants of patient satisfaction with telemental health services is very limited. Objective: This study aimed to identify determinants of patient satisfaction with telemental health services. Methods: A cross-sectional, quota-based (quotas: gender and age group), web-based survey was conducted in December 2023 in Germany. The sample included individuals aged 18-74 years who had received telemental health services since March 2020 (N=854). Patient satisfaction with video, telephone, and asynchronous services was measured using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire or the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire adapted to internet-based interventions. The association of socioeconomic, access, health, psychosocial, personality, and COVID-19-related factors, as well as patient preferences and provider characteristics with patient satisfaction, was tested using multiple linear regressions. Results: A positive patient attitude towards telemental health services and greater fear of COVID-19 as well as a positive and open provider attitude and higher provider skills for using the services were positively associated with patient satisfaction in all service groups (P<.05). Furthermore, the patients' educational level, employment status, relationship status, certain personality factors, technology commitment, loneliness, self-efficacy, and internet connection quality at home were significantly associated with satisfaction in at least 1 service group. Physical and mental health determinants were not significantly associated with the outcome. Conclusions: Satisfaction with telemental health services is particularly associated with psychosocial characteristics, individual preferences, and attitudes of patients, which should be considered when addressing target groups for the services. Furthermore, positive provider attitudes towards and higher skills for using the services are heavily associated with patient satisfaction. Training and support for providers should be prioritized to promote patient satisfaction and widespread use of future services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.416 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Mental Health→Same topicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation→French-language works237,207→