MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Beam current deterioration in a 13.56 MHz RF negative ion source

2025· article· en· W4410859882 on OpenAlexaff
Anand George, Stéphane Melanson, Morgan Dehnel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsSelkirk CollegePacific Insight Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)IonIon beamBeam (structure)Atomic physicsIon sourceMaterials sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineering physicsOpticsEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract D-Pace is developing a 13.56 MHz external planar antenna-powered RF ion source for producing negative ions (H - , D - ). The cesium-free RF ion source is expected to operate with lower maintenance cycle compared to D-Pace's TRIUMF-licensed filament ion source. The present challenge with the RF ion source is the deterioration in H - beam current extracted from the ion source during its operation over several days. The reasons behind the beam decay are not yet fully understood. Sputtering of the copper plasma chamber and the AlN RF window are considered likely causes for the beam decay. Experimental observations related to the RF ion source beam deterioration are presented in the current paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of InstrumentationSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207