MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410869007 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106772

Effects of Early Neonatal Administration of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 202195 on the Fecal Microbiota of Infants in Dhaka, Bangladesh

2025· article· en· W4410869007 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer C. Onuora, Anna Neustaeter, Huma Qamar, Lisa G. Pell, Antonio González, Daniel McDonald, Aline C. Freitas, Daniela S. Perry, Davidson H. Hamer, Diego G. Bassani, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Mohammad Shyful Islam, Prakesh S. Shah, Mohammad Rashedul Haque, Samir K. Saha, Shafiqul Alam Sarker, Shamima Sultana, Shaun K. Morris, Rob Knight, Daniel Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationCentre for Global Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesPhysiologyBiologyMedicineMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Interventions aimed at altering the composition of the gut microbiome have the potential to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries where the burden of neonatal mortality remains high. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 202195 (LP), provided either as a synbiotic with fructooligosaccharide (LP+FOS) or probiotics (LP), on the fecal microbiome composition and bacterial diversity in infants living in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207