MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410869490 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106248

Barriers to Farmers Market Vouchers Redemption Among Hartford WIC Participants: A Pilot Study to Strengthen WIC Benefits Use and to Develop a Childhood Obesity Intervention

2025· article· en· W4410869490 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Angela Bermúdez‐Millán, Ponita Khouy

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureInstitute of Cancer ResearchU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsVoucherChildhood obesityIntervention (counseling)ObesityGerontologySupplemental Nutrition Assistance ProgramMedicineFamily medicineEnvironmental healthPsychologyMedical educationBusinessNursingFood insecurityOverweightGeographyAgricultureFood security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: In December 2023, Hartford WIC program had 5,689 active clients. Low-income children, between the ages of 2 and 5 were overweight (15.2%) and obese (17,5%) (1). Unhealthy eating behaviors are major contributors. Families in predominantly minority and low-income neighborhoods have limited access to supermarkets and fresh produce. The WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program has expanded access to fresh produce, by distributing vouchers, for redemption at farmers markets. Unfortunately, redemption rates are low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207