Enviro-Technical Assessment of Social Responses to Water Demand Management Policies Facing Water Scarcity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because cities are particularly vulnerable to freshwater scarcity, optimal water usage is critical for urban resilience, addressing health concerns, and meeting basic human needs, particularly in water-scarce regions. However, any water management measure applied in urban settings can influence key stakeholders and, even more broadly, water infrastructure like the urban water distribution networks (UWDNs). Given the severe and ongoing water scarcity, Iranian water utilities have recently implemented a policy called “Limiting Water Access using Pressure Management” (LWAPM). With direct and indirect implications across various aspects, this strategy involves reducing water pressure even lower than the minimum required level in the UWDNs, compelling households to purchase and install residential pump and tank systems. Such a social response results in making a complex triple feedback loop encompassing technical, social, and environmental dimensions. Hence, an enviro-technical assessment was carried out by introducing a creative methodological approach to comprehensively examine the direct and indirect mutual effects of applying the LWAPM policy through hydraulic simulation and life cycle thinking. The scope of this research incorporated the whole of the urban water system, including the UWDN, urban water supply system (UWSS), and residential water network (RWN). The study highlighted that introducing residential pump and tank systems into a given UWDN in Iran, Isfahan Province, led to substantial environmental consequences. In the short term (1 year), implementing the LWAPM policy led to endpoint environmental impacts that were double those seen when the policy was not in place. However, over a longer period (19 years), the impact was reduced, exhibiting only a 1.4 times increase relative to the baseline levels before the policy’s implementation. Furthermore, the findings revealed that the residential pump and tank systems effectively distributed pressure across floors and alleviated water shortages in residential units, particularly on higher floors of buildings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".