MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410874439 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.15323

Celebrating a Decade of the HFA Young Community: Achievements and Future Directions by the HFA Young Committee

2025· review· en· W4410874439 on OpenAlexaff
Mateusz Sokolski, Emanuele Bobbio, Alberto Esteban‐Fernández, Sotiria Liori, Cornelia Margineaunu, Francesca Musella, Chris J. Kapelios, Henrike Arfsten, Shirley Sze, Daniela Tomasoni, Han Naung Tun, Markus Wallner, Brenda Moura, Ewa A. Jankowska, Alexandre Mebazaa, Marco Metra, Wilfried Müllens, Jozine M. ter Maaten, Antonio Cannatà

Bibliographic record

VenueESC Heart Failure · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGerontologyLibrary scienceEngineering ethicsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Heart Failure Association (HFA) Young initiative, established in 2014, welcomes all HFA members under 40 years of age, including physicians, scientists, nurses and allied health professionals. Its primary aim is to foster the growth of the next generation of heart failure (HF) specialists through a variety of educational and career-building programmes such as the monthly HFA Cardiotalk Podcast, the quarterly HFA Journal Club and the Career Café. The members also have the possibility to participate in the construction of the annual HFA congress programme and benefit from travel grants for the HFA Congress, and networking events at scientific meetings. In 2022-2023, the HFA Young conducted a survey that garnered 305 members, giving an important snapshot of their needs, expectations and aspirations, which served as a roadmap for the priorities of the group. Finally, in order to build and maintain networks of young professionals at the national level, the HFA Young Ambassadors initiative was established, connecting the HFA Young Committee with young HF professionals in their respective countries. This initiative has proven to be crucial for building a global community of emerging HF specialists and enhancing the awareness of the HFA's activities. The article presents the evolution of HFA Young over the past 10 years, summarizes key activities and survey results and seeks to outline future development directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESC Heart FailureSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207