MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410878999 · doi:10.1186/s12978-025-01989-0

Identifying promising or priority effective adolescent, sexual and reproductive health interventions in Ghana: what frameworks should guide the selection of interventions?

2025· article· en· W4410878999 on OpenAlex
Daniel Malik Achala, Ama Pokuaa Fenny, Chris Atim, John E. Ataguba

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanada Research ChairsInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPsychological interventionReproductive healthMedicineStakeholderEnvironmental healthPopulationStakeholder engagementPublic healthNursingPublic relationsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) is an integral part of the global health agenda. It is strongly featured in the universal health coverage (UHC) agenda of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). The need to expand ASRH services to accelerate progress on UHC is urgent in Africa, compared to other regions, given its youthful population and unmet ASRH needs. Limited access to ASRH services increases the risk and vulnerability of adolescents to poor health outcomes such as unintended pregnancies, high adolescent birth rate, poor birth outcomes, high maternal and neonatal mortalities and high exposure to sexually transmitted infections. The unavailability and inaccessibility of ASRH interventions to adolescents and young adults in most African countries, including Ghana, arise from several limitations, including inadequate funding of interventions, cultural barriers and norms, lack of education, and inadequate supplies of ASRH services and commodities, among others. However, gains from investments in ASRH interventions, especially following the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals, highlight the importance of identifying and prioritising adequate funding for effective ASRH interventions. This paper identifies priority ASRH interventions that can potentially advance the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of adolescents in Ghana to accelerate progress towards UHC. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methods, combining literature review and stakeholder engagement, were used for this study. A literature review complemented by stakeholder engagement ensured the listing, ranking and validation of interventions. RESULTS: Adapting an established framework designed by the West African Health Organization (WAHO) through stakeholders' engagement process, the paper identifies four of seven priority interventions ranked and validated by stakeholders for addressing the SRH needs of adolescents in Ghana. Consistent with the literature, several interventions exist to address ASRH needs. The most effective priority or promising four interventions in Ghana, according to stakeholders, include adolescent health clubs programmes, girls' empowerment programmes through comprehensive sexuality education, national capacity-building programmes to deliver high-quality integrated family planning and comprehensive maternal health services, and electronic health (eHealth)/digital health programmes. CONCLUSION: Identifying effective priority interventions for addressing the SRH needs of adolescents is a consultative process facilitated by proven and valid frameworks adapted to align with specific country contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it