MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410884998 · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.05.011

Enzalutamide plus radium-223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of the EORTC 1333/PEACE-3 trial

2025· article· en· W4410884998 on OpenAlexaff
Bertrand Tombal, Ananya Choudhury, Farid Saad, E. Gallardo, Andrey Soares, Yohann Loriot, Ray McDermott, A. Rodriguez-Vida, Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Franco Nolè, Felipe José Silva Melo Cruz, Thierry Roumeguère, Gedske Daugaard, Rosely Yamamura, Emmanuelle Bompas, Pablo Maroto, F Gómez Veiga, Iwona Skoneczna, Karine Martins da Trindade, Flavio Mavignier Cárcano, Frédéric Lecouvet, Corneel Coens, Coralie Poncet, B. Fournier, S. Gillessen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersAstellas Pharma EuropeAstellas PharmaBayer HealthCareBayerAstellas Pharma US
KeywordsMedicineEnzalutamideProstate cancerRadium-223OncologyInternal medicineCancerRadiumUrologyRadiochemistryBone metastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The EORTC 1333 'PEACE-3' study investigated the combination of enzalutamide and 6 monthly injections of radium-223 (Ra223) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2015 to March 2023, 446 patients, including 11 who received abiraterone, were randomized to enzalutamide (without placebo) or enzalutamide combined with six cycles of Ra223. As of March 2018, the co-administration of zoledronic acid or denosumab was mandatory. The primary endpoint was radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) by investigator assessment. Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to subsequent systemic treatment, pain progression, and symptomatic skeletal event. RESULTS: The hazard ratio (HR) for rPFS was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.87, P = 0.0009], with a median rPFS of 16.4 months (95% CI 13.8-19.2 months) in the enzalutamide arm and 19.4 months (95% CI 17.1-25.3 months) in the combination arm. At the preplanned interim analysis conducted at 80% of the OS events, the HR for OS was 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.90, P = 0.0031), with a median OS of 35.0 months (95% CI 28.8-38.9 months) in the enzalutamide arm and 42.3 months (95% CI 36.8-49.1 months) in the combination arm. Due to non-proportional hazards, this will be tested further at the final OS analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) ≥ grade 3 were recorded in 55.8% and 65.6% of the patients in the enzalutamide and combination arms, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 TEAEs in the combination arm were hypertension (34%), fatigue (6%), fracture (5%), anemia (5%), and neutropenia (5%). Fractures [either treatment-emergent or post-treatment, symptomatic or pathologic, or with or without bone-protecting agent (BPA) use] were reported in 30 (13.4%) patients in the enzalutamide arm and 53 patients (24.3%) in the combination arm. CONCLUSION: PEACE-3 demonstrates that combining enzalutamide with Ra223 as first-line therapy for mCRPC significantly improves rPFS. Although statistically significant at the OS interim boundary, the study will continue to the final OS analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207