MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410886063 · doi:10.1515/crpm-2024-0031

Duplication of chromosome 1q32.1q44: presented with ventriculomegaly and transient myeloproliferative disorder of the newborn

2025· article· en· W4410886063 on OpenAlexaff
Medha Goyal, Małgorzata J.M. Nowaczyk, Vicky R. Breakey, M. Elizabeth McCready, Ipsita Goswami

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Perinatal Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTrisomyVentriculomegalyFailure to thriveLeukemoid reactionPathologyGeneticsPediatricsBiologyPregnancyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Partial trisomy of chromosome 1 has been reported following unbalanced translocations with partial monosomies of other chromosomes and rarely as a pure partial duplication. We aim to discuss partial trisomy 1q with cytogenetics and describe our findings of this uncommon chromosomal aneuploidy. Case presentation: A male term neonate presented with antenatal ventriculomegaly and early fetal growth restriction. He was dysmorphic at birth and his postnatal course was complicated by transient myeloproliferative disorder, neonatal seizures, skin rash, conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, and milk protein allergy. Etiological work-ups including congenital infections, immunological disorders, and inborn error of metabolisms were negative. The findings of transient myeloproliferative disorder in association with partial 1q trisomy which have not been previously described in the literature, raise the possibility of abnormal vasculature of generalized nature, resulting in cutis marmorata, signs of intestinal inflammation, and abnormal cerebral vascular supply. Conclusions: This case study highlights the importance of pooling cases with similar locations of duplication, segment size, and related chromosomal deficiency together to understand distinct clinical phenotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in Perinatal MedicineSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207