MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410888162 · doi:10.1038/s41531-025-00991-4

Central biogenic amine deficiency with concomitant exploratory behavioral deficits in Dnajc12 knock-out mice

2025· article· en· W4410888162 on OpenAlexaff
Isaac Bul Deng, Jordan Follett, Jesse D. Fox, Shannon Wall, Matthew J. Farrer

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Parkinson s Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesUniversity of FloridaEmory University
KeywordsConcomitantNeuroscienceBiogenic amineMedicinePsychologyPharmacologyPsychiatryInternal medicineCentral nervous systemNeurotransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bi-allelic autosomal recessive pathogenic variants in DNAJC12 lead to a constellation of neurological features, including young-onset Parkinson's disease. DNAJC12 is a co-chaperone for enzymes involved in biogenic amines synthesis. In vitro, we discovered overexpressed DNAJC12 forms a complex with guanine triphosphate cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1), a rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin, a cofactor for biogenic amine synthesis. We also confirm DNAJC12's interaction with tyrosine (TH) and tryptophan hydroxylases, paramount for dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) synthesis. In-vitro knock-down of DNAJC12 with a siRNA destabilizes DNAJC12-TH-GCH1 complex, whereas reciprocal co-overexpression of TH and GCH1 increases endogenous DNAJC12. Dnajc12 knock-out mice (DKO) exhibit reduced exploratory behavior at 3 months of age in open-field testing. In striatal tissue, total DA and 5-HT, and electrically evoked DA release are all reduced, with enhanced phosphorylation of Th at Ser31 and Ser40. DKO mice present models to develop/refine therapeutics approaches for biogenic amines disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Parkinson s DiseaseSame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207