MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410888471 · doi:10.1080/13696998.2025.2513766

Real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in major depressive disorder and bipolar I disorder in the United States

2025· article· en· W4410888471 on OpenAlexafffund
Roger S. McIntyre, Mousam Parikh, Jamie T. Ta, Simranpreet Waraich, Chandra J. Cohen-Stavi, Carl D. Marci, Nadia Nabulsi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBausch HealthAbbVie CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEisaiPurdue UniversityBiogenCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSunovionNovo NordiskSanofiPfizer
KeywordsMedicineBipolar disorderMajor depressive disorderPsychiatryBipolar I disorderManiaMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims The efficacy of cariprazine for major depressive disorder (MDD) (adjunctive therapy) and bipolar I (BP-I) depression has been demonstrated in clinical trials. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of cariprazine in reducing depression severity among patients with moderate-to-severe MDD or BP-I depression.Methods Medical/pharmacy claims and electronic medical records (EMRs) from specialty providers in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud were used to identify adults with MDD or BP-I who initiated cariprazine (adjunctively for MDD) (first dispensing = index) and had ≥1 EMR and ≥1 claim during 12-month baseline and ≤12-month follow-up periods. Included patients had a baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 total score ≥10, reflecting at least moderate depressive symptoms. Follow-up continued until cariprazine discontinuation, alternate diagnosis (e.g., BP-I [MDD cohort] or MDD [BP-I cohort]), or 12 months post-index. Depression severity was assessed using PHQ-9 total scores that were observed or estimated from clinical notes using a previously validated machine learning algorithm. Analyses included mean change in PHQ-9 score from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using only observed PHQ-9 scores was conducted.Results Of 754 patients at baseline, 396 had MDD (mean PHQ-9 = 16.4) and 358 had BP-I (mean PHQ-9 = 16.9). For patients with MDD, mean reductions in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months of adjunctive cariprazine treatment were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.7, 4.4; n = 127), 4.1 (2.9, 5.4; n = 87), and 3.7 (1.6, 5.8; n = 52), respectively. For patients with BP-I, mean reductions from baseline to 2, 6, and 12 months were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2, 6.2; n = 121), 6.5 (5.2, 7.8; n = 90), and 6.9 (5.2, 8.5; n = 54), respectively. Greater improvements were observed in the sensitivity analysis.Conclusions This real-world effectiveness study of cariprazine treatment for MDD (adjunctive use) or BP-I demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in depression symptoms during short- and long-term follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical EconomicsSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207