Exploring the adoption intention of long-term care regulatory systems in Guangxi, China: The role of innovation attributes and perceived risk
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the adoption intention of the Long-Term Care (LTC) regulatory system in Guangxi, China, emphasizing the influence of innovation attributes and perceived risk. It analyzes how relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability positively affect healthcare providers' and elderly care institutions' willingness to adopt the system. The study further explores the moderating role of perceived risk in strengthening the relationship between these innovation attributes and adoption intention. Data were collected through a survey of 370 professionals from hospitals, rural health centers, and elderly care institutions and analyzed using SPSS and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results indicate that all five innovation attributes significantly enhance adoption intention, with perceived risk amplifying these effects. The findings underscore the need for supportive policies, technological advancement, and coordinated stakeholder engagement to ensure successful LTC system implementation. This research provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry leaders to support the expansion of LTC insurance systems amid China’s aging population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it