MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410899735 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100636

Experiences of healthcare interactions before and after suicidal behaviour among older adults attending geropsychiatric services: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

2025· article· en· W4410899735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M.D. Folke Sjöberg, Sara Hed, Stefan Wiktorsson, Anne Ingeborg Berg, Jennifer Strand, Sabrina Doering, Margda Wærn

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVetenskapsrådetForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdStiftelsen Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons
KeywordsMedicineFeelingPsychiatryLonelinessDenialDementiaSuicidal ideationHealth careInterpretative phenomenological analysisMental healthOutpatient clinicBorderline personality disorderClinical psychologyQualitative researchPoison controlSuicide preventionPsychologyDiseasePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Physical illness and functional disability are common in older adult populations and strongly linked to suicidal behaviour. The aim was to explore how older adults who engaged in a suicidal act experienced their interactions with healthcare providers. DESIGN: This study re-examined transcripts from a broader study involving experiences of older adults who took part in two separate semi-structured interviews focusing on their experiences before and after a suicidal act. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was applied. SETTING: A geriatric psychiatric outpatient clinic in a large Swedish city. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (70+) were recruited among consecutive Swedish-speaking patients in outpatient treatment following a suicidal act within the last 3-36 months. Exclusion criteria were personality disorder, ongoing psychosis, aphasia, delirium, clinical dementia or Montreal Cognitive Assessment score indicating moderate/severe cognitive impairment. Out of 22 eligible, nine accepted participation (four women and five men, age range 71-92 years). Prior to the suicidal act, all had their main care contact in primary care, and all but one were on antidepressants. RESULTS: Participants described interactions with healthcare services that amplified their feelings of alienation, loneliness, worthlessness and self-stigma. Difficulties accessing care increased their sense of powerlessness. Some participants were cognizant of their mental health needs but experienced obstacles that hindered them from managing their illness, which reduced their sense of agency. These situations increased frustration and hopelessness and contributed to the development of suicidal behaviour. On the contrary, feeling listened to in trustful and validating relationships helped restore self-respect and agency and fostered engagement in their individual suicide preventative strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings can inform educational interventions and clinical approaches to the care and management of older adults with symptoms of common mental disorders. Exploring experiences of care interactions before and after suicidal acts across different clinical settings and cultures could be areas for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies→French-language works237,207→