MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410901206 · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02805-x

Factors affecting resilience in pregnant Lebanese women exposed to overlapping crises

2025· article· en· W4410901206 on OpenAlexaff
Maya Bizri, Sima Fatima Sharafeddin, Duaa Fahs, Hala Itani, Ghida Kassir, Ghina Ghazeeri

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyResilience (materials science)Psychological researchDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Resilience is a critical determinant of individuals' psychological well-being and their ability to cope with adversity. Resilience has emerged as a point of clinical relevance when addressing the effects of extreme environmental adversity on vulnerable populations. Lebanon experienced an economic collapse, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Beirut Blast within the span of a single year, causing significant lasting damage. Pregnant women were particularly vulnerable during this period of time. This study aims to measure the resilience of pregnant women in Lebanon after exposure to multiple, large-scale traumatic events. It also examines the potential effect of obstetrical factors, perceived stress, perceived social support, and childhood experiences on resilience scores. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among Lebanese pregnant women. A total of 257 pregnant Lebanese women who resided in Lebanon during all three crises were recruited to participate. Resilience, adverse and benevolent childhood experiences, and perceived social support were measured using validated scales: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Adverse Childhood Experiences questionnaire, the Benevolent Childhood experiences scale, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support respectively. We also included a section on perceived stress, which included questions about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economic crisis, and the Beirut blast. RESULTS: Our findings revealed a significant negative correlation between resilience and perceived stress (b=-0.157), suggesting resilience's protective role against the negative impact of stress during pregnancy. Furthermore, a positive correlation was demonstrated between perceived social support and resilience (b = 0.19), underscoring the importance of supportive networks in boosting resilience. CONCLUSION: This research contributes vital knowledge to the understanding of resilience during the perinatal period. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive prenatal care that incorporates social and psychological support, thereby enhancing resilience and overall well-being in pregnant women amidst the multifaceted challenges faced in Lebanon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychologySame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207