MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410901256 · doi:10.1111/dom.16478

Effects of dapagliflozin on sodium excretion, blood pressure and volume status in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease: The <scp>DAPASALT</scp> trial

2025· article· en· W4410901256 on OpenAlexaff
Jelle M. Beernink, Niels Jongs, Charlotte M. Mosterd, Rosalie A. Scholtes, Alyssa Caldwell‐McGee, Daniel Casillas, Lynette Driscoll, Peter J. Greasley, Cecilia Karlsson, Ann Hammarstedt, Vikas S. Sridhar, Marcel H.A. Muskiet, Gozewijn D. Laverman, David Z.I. Cherney, Petter Bjornstad, Daniël H. van Raalte, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Obesity and Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersAstraZenecaAstraZeneca Mölndal
KeywordsDapagliflozinMedicineType 2 diabetesKidney diseaseBlood pressureDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineExcretionEndocrinologySodiumUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: We assessed the effects of dapagliflozin on natriuresis and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and evaluated the consistency of these effects across patients with type 2 diabetes without CKD and CKD without type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a mechanistic, nonrandomised, open-label study to evaluate the effects of dapagliflozin on sodium excretion and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD under a standardised sodium intake (150 mmol/day). Evaluations were performed at baseline (average of Days -3 to -1), treatment start (average of Days 2-4; hereafter referred to as Day 4), treatment end (average of Days 12-14; hereafter referred to as Day 14) and washout (average of Days 15-17). Similar protocols were applied to the type 2 diabetes without CKD and CKD without type 2 diabetes strata. Data from all strata were pooled to assess the consistency of the effects of dapagliflozin. RESULTS: In 13 participants with type 2 diabetes and CKD, 24-h sodium excretion did not increase during treatment, as reflected by changes from baseline (Day 4 change: -0.5 mmol/24-h [95% CI -15.4, 14.5], p = 0.95; Day 14 change: -11.7 mmol/24-h [95% CI -30.4, 7.1]). Compared to baseline, 24-h systolic blood pressure decreased by 6.0 mmHg [95% CI -19.8, 7.7] at Day 4 and by 3.7 mmHg [95% CI -13.7, 6.2] at Day 14. In the pooled stratum of 33 participants, 24-h sodium excretion remained unchanged relative to baseline (Day 4 change: -7.4 mmol/24-h [95% CI -16.2, 1.5], p = 0.10; Day 14 change: -10.1 mmol/24-h [95% CI -25.1, 5.0], p = 0.18), whereas 24-h systolic blood pressure was consistently reduced by 6.8 mmHg ([95% CI -10.4, -3.3], p < 0.001) at Day 4 and by 6.5 mmHg ([95% CI -10.1, -3.0], p < 0.001) at Day 14, with no evidence of heterogeneity across strata. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin reduced blood pressure during standardised sodium intake in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or CKD without increasing sodium excretion, suggesting that the blood pressure-lowering effects occur through mechanisms beyond natriuresis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Obesity and MetabolismSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207