MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410904045 · doi:10.18280/acsm.490206

Optimization of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Production by Pulsed Laser Ablation: A Study on Energy Density Effects

2025· article· en· W4410904045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali M. Ahmed, Russul M. Shehab, Mayss Alreem N. Hammed, Ghaidaa A. Khalid, Ghufran S. Jaber, Mustafa Adnan Zaidan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopperLaser ablationMaterials scienceNanoparticleAblationEnergy densityCopper oxideLaserProduction (economics)MetallurgyOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemical engineeringEngineering physicsOpticsPhysicsMedicineInternal medicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanomaterial's especially metal oxide nanoparticles have recently been of interest in many fields such as physics, biology, and medicine.This work employs Pulsed laser ablation in liquid as a clean and versatile technique for synthesizing copper oxide nanoparticles that produce high-quality materials with minimal chemical interference.Copper plates were treated in deionized water using laser energy density to produce copper nanoparticles at two different energy densities of 400 and 800 mJ.Copper oxide nanoparticles categorized by X-ray diffraction method, UV-visible spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Changes in absorption spectra and subsequent UVvisible spectroscopy were observed for particle size, with a redshift at greater laser intensity (650 nm for 800 mJ compared to 600 nm for 400 mJ).X-ray diffraction (XRD) result presented this material as having a monoclinic crystalline structure with particle size estimated to be between 30 and 60 nm (34.626 and 34.714 2 for 400 mJ; 31.49 and 66.45 2 for 800 mJ).Specific morphological analyses through SEM showed products contained elongated nanoflake-like shaped particles extending to 800 mJ that aggregated into a rough structure which boost their catalytic effectiveness.These results confirm application for photocatalytic activities, antibacterial activity, and enhanced biomedical science by controlling size, optical, structure, and morphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207