MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410906266 · doi:10.22621/cfn.v138i3.3285

Stream restoration: a key to the survival and recovery of the Endangered Western Brook Lamprey (<i>Lampetra richardsoni</i>), Morrison Creek population

2025· article· en· W4410906266 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Warren Fleenor, Paul B. C. Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaPacific Salmon Foundation
KeywordsLampetraLampreyEndangered speciesPopulationFisheryThreatened speciesKey (lock)BiologyGeographyEnvironmental ethicsEcologyDemographySociologyHabitatPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquatic ecosystems and species are increasingly threatened by anthropogenic activities. Stream restoration has thereforebecome a necessary conservation strategy to improve habitat quality and quantity, which are key components of productive, healthy, resilient aquatic ecosystems. The Morrison Creek watershed on Vancouver Island, British Columbia has been impacted by anthropogenic activities resulting in the degradation of aquatic habitat. For an Endangered, range-restricted species like Western Brook Lamprey (Lampetra richardsoni), Morrison Creek population, which only occurs in this one watershed, any habitat-related impacts have the potential to cause population level declines, thereby increasing the risk of extinction. Stream and riparian restoration were therefore undertaken to ameliorate the species’ Critical Habitat, which no longer supported spawning and early rearing. Effectiveness of restoration was determined through the use of restored areas for spawning, increased hydraulic complexity, and reduced sedimentation. Lamprey (adults and larvae) and salmonids (Oncorhynchus spp.) had not been observed in this habitat since 2005; however, following habitat restoration in 2021, 10 different lamprey nests were observed being tended in the restored habitat in 2022. Salmonids were also observed using the newly created habitat for spawning in fall 2021 and fry and smolts used pools and riffles for rearing the following spring and summer. Our work demonstrates specific types of habitat restoration that are effective for lamprey conservation and validates that complex restoration activity can occur when there is effective collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207