MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410907203 · doi:10.1111/bph.70072

Biodiversity2Drugs—Renaissance of exploring nature‐derived peptides for GPCR ligand discovery

2025· article· en· W4410907203 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christian W. Gruber, Isabel Beets, Pierre‐Luc Boudreault, Vanderlan da Silva Bolzani, Jens Carlsson, Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes, Michael Freissmuth, Nicolas Gilles, Ulf Göransson, Alexander S. Hauser, Christian Heinis, Jeroen Kool, William D. Lubell, Maria Vittoria Modica, Jana Selent, Jan Tytgat, Eivind A. B. Undheim

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFundación BiodiversidadVlaamse regeringConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoAgence Nationale de la RechercheNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBiodiversa+European CommissionSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungConselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à PesquisaInnovationsfondenNorges ForskningsrådAustrian Science FundVetenskapsrådetNational Science Foundation
KeywordsThe RenaissanceG protein-coupled receptorDrug discoveryComputational biologyData scienceLigand (biochemistry)ChemistryComputer scienceNeuroscienceBiologyBioinformaticsReceptorBiochemistryArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

sponsorship: his research was funded by Biodiversa+, the European Biodiversity Partnership, in the context of the'Biodiversity2Drugs'project under the 2023-2024 BiodivNBSjoint call. It was co-funded by the European Commission (GA No. 101052342) and the following funding organisations: Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Austria), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France), Fonds Voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (Belgium), Research Council of Norway (Norway), Dutch Research Council (The Netherlands), Brazilian National Council of State Funding Agencies & Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brazil), Fonds de Recherche du Quebec (Canada), Innovation Fund Denmark (Denmark), Ministry of Universities and Research (Italy), Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P. (Portugal), Agencia Estatal de Investigacion & Fundacion Biodiversidad (Spain), The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural, Sciences, and Spatial Planning (Sweden), and Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland); Austrian Science Fund (FWF), Grant/AwardNumber: 10.55776/PIN5093924. (Biodiversa+, European Biodiversity Partnership, European Commission|101052342, Fonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Austria), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France), Fonds Voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (Belgium), Research Council of Norway (Norway), Dutch Research Council (The Netherlands), Brazilian National Council of State Funding Agencies & Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brazil), Fonds de Recherche du Quebec (Canada), Innovation Fund Denmark (Denmark), Ministry of Universities and Research (Italy), Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P. (Portugal), Agencia Estatal de Investigacion & Fundacion Biodiversidad (Spain), Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural, Sciences, and Spatial Planning (Sweden), Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland), Austrian Science Fund (FWF)|10.55776/PIN5093924)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207