MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410907791 · doi:10.1002/csc2.70084

Plasticity of maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) roots in water‐deficient and nitrogen‐limited soil

2025· article· en· W4410907791 on OpenAlexaff
Yutong Jiang, Joann K. Whalen

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsZea maysBiologyAgronomyPoaceaeNitrogenBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Maize ( Zea mays L.), a versatile global crop with diverse application in food, feed, and industry, experiences production challenges due to water deficits and concurrent nitrogen (N) limitations. Maize relies on multiple root types, including primary, seminal, crown, brace roots, and associated lateral roots, to acquire water and nutrients from the soil. These root types exhibit distinct soil water and N uptake capacities, dynamically adjusting their morphological and anatomical traits to optimize resource uptake. This review summarizes the plastic responses of maize roots to soil water deficit, N limitation, and lack of other essential nutrients. In response to water deficit, maize axial roots bend toward regions with higher water availability and produce more lateral roots. Simultaneously, the diameter of the root xylem decreases, facilitating sustained water uptake from dry soil. In response to N limitation, maize increases lateral root length, reduces xylem area, and increases cortical aerenchyma. This review enhances our understanding of maize root adaptability in water‐limited and N‐poor soils, offering valuable perspectives on optimizing root growth for improved water and N acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207