MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410926580 · doi:10.63824/jptsp.v12i1.266

DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR PENGAMAN MUARA SUNGAI BOGOWONTO TERHADAP BAHAYA BANJIR

2025· article· id· W4410926580 on OpenAlexaff
Ndaru Sukmono Aji, Agung Prapsetyo, Muhammad Zain Triputra

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL PERTAHANAN · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adanya pembangunan Infrastruktur Pengaman Muara Sungai Bogowonto sebagai bangunan pendukung pengamanan Kawasan Strategis Yogyakarta Internasional Airport akan berdampak terhadap Dusun di Desa jangkaran Kecamatan Temon Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian dilakukan secara analisis deskriptif terhadap data yang diperoleh. Peneliti melakukan eksplorasi terhadap kejadian banjir tahunan di dua Dusun Desa Jangkaran kecamatan Temon Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara kepada narasumber, pengamatan dan studi dokumen. Makalah ini merupakan upaya perintis untuk mengkaji dampak pembangunan Infrastruktur Pengaman Muara Sungai Bogowonto sebagai bangunan pendukung pengamanan Kawasan Strategis Yogyakarta Internasional Airport terhadap Dusun Pasir Mendit dan Dusun Pasir Kadilangu yang selama ini mengalami banjir setiap tahunnya. Pembangunan Pengaman Muara Sungai Bogowonto yang bertujuan untuk melindungi dan mengamankan Kawasan Strategis YIA berdampak positif terhadap Dusun Pasir Mendit dan Dusun Pasir Kadilangu yang selama ini mengalami banjir tahunan akibat tertutupnya muara Sungai Bogowonto. Pembangunan Jetty pengaman muara sungai tersebut menjadikan kawasan sekitar muara telah terhindar dari banjir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL PERTAHANANSame topicMultimedia Learning SystemsFrench-language works237,207