Impact of Work-Life Quality on Employees Job Performance: A Case Study of Kavin Group Company Kurdistan – Iraq
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper discussed impact of work-life quality of on employees’ job performance in kavin group company Kurdistan - Iraq. The research question ascertained the extent to which work-life quality influences employees job satisfaction, work-life balance, productivity and turnover in Kavin group company Kurdistan. A cross- sectional research design was used in carrying out the study in which primary data was generated using questionnaire. A sample size of 150 was purposively determined from a population of 1000 employees of Kavin Group company Duhok –Kurdistan. The sample size consisting of 15 managers, 30 supervisors and 105 shop-floor workers were randomly selected from the population size using stratified random sampling method of shuffling and selection of cards without replacement method. The period of study is between September, 2023 and August, 2024.This study concludes that work-life quality has to a large extent influenced employees’ job satisfaction, work-life balance, productivity and turnover in Kavin group company Kurdistan and therefore and recommends among others: creation of awareness on the importance of good and sustainable work-life quality, continuous review of existing work environment, regular training and development of the workforce, matching of employees' specialties with open positions while hiring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it