Bibliographic record
Abstract
em determinada ocasião, de um encontro da "Sociedade de Pesquisa do Pietismo" (Gese/lschaft zur Etforschung des Pietismus) para a sua turma de seminário na Universidade de Tübingen, mostrou-se muito surpreso e consternado acerca da opinião de alguns de seus colegas de área: "O Pietismo é para eles uma questão histórica encerrada, do séc.XVIII.Provavelmente, para eles não está claro que 0 • Fonte: Hartmut Schmid (Ed.):Was will der Pietismus?(c) R. Brockhaus Vcrlag, Wuppertal 2(Xl2." Rolf Hillc (Dr.) é Reitor do "Albrecht-Bcngcl-l-laus", uma instituição evangélico-pietista criada para acompanhar estudantes de t~~logia eI~1 seus estudos univcrsitârios, na cidade de Tübingen, na Alemanha.O presente texto 101 traduzido do alemão por Claus Schwambach tendo como título original: Die Enveck1111g-Vieljhlt 1111d theologisc/1es Pnifil einer bedewenden°/Jeweg 11 ni: in der eva11geli1-d1en Christenheit, in: l-lrntmut Schmid (Ed.) Wns will der Pictismus'! 1-fistrnis~hc Bcobachtungcn und aktucllc Hcrauslordcrungcn.Bcitriigc aus dcm Albrccht-Bengcl-I-hus Tübingcn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".