Geometry aware graph attention networks to explain single-cell chromatin state and gene expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High-throughput measurements that profile the transcriptome or the epigenome of single-cells are becoming a common way to study cell identity. These data are high dimensional, sparse and non linear. Here we present SEAGALL (Single-cell Explainable Geometry-Aware Graph Attention Learning pipeLine), a hypothesis free method to extract biologically relevant features from single-cell experiments based on geometry regularised autoencoders (GRAE) and explainable graph attention networks (GAT). We use a GRAE to embed the data into a latent space preserving the data geometry and we construct a cell-to-cell graph computing distances in the GRAE bottleneck. Exploiting the attention mechanism to dynamically learn the relevant edges, we use GATs to classify the cells and we explain the predictions of the model with XAI methods to unravel the features which are driving cell identity beyond marker genes. We apply our method to data sets from scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq and scChIP-seq experiments. SEAGALL can extract cell type specific and stable signatures which not only differ from the ones found in classical linear approaches but are less biassed by coverage and high expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".