Type 2 diabetes duration and irisin response after an aerobic exercise intervention: results from the INTENSITY study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irisin, an adipo-myokine, is positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness and negatively associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, it is unclear if individuals with longer or shorter durations of T2DM express the same irisin levels following exercise. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of 28 weeks of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise on irisin levels in individuals with short- and long-duration T2DM. This secondary analysis included participants ( n = 34) aged ≥ 19 years old with T2DM who completed 28 weeks of aerobic exercise training for 150 min per week at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity—16 weeks at a moderate intensity (4.5 metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs)) and then randomized to 12 weeks of maintained-intensity (4.5 METs) or increased-intensity (6.0 METs) aerobic exercise. Participants were categorized into two groups: (1) short-duration T2DM (<10 years) or (2) long-duration T2DM (≥10 years). Irisin was analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blotting techniques. All measurements were performed at baseline, 16 weeks, and 28 weeks. A significant time × T2DM duration group interaction ( F(2) = 8.062, p < 0.01) was observed with 28 weeks of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise. Western blot analysis revealed a 1.37-fold increase in plasma irisin expression ( p = 0.03) in the long-duration increased-intensity group and no change in irisin expression ( p > 0.05) in the maintained-intensity groups of short and long duration. The results of this analysis suggest that 28 weeks of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise differently impacted plasma irisin in individuals with short- or long-duration T2DM. The Improving Individual Glycemic Response with Exercise Intensity (INTENSITY) study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03787836).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".