MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410946477 · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2025.05.023

Neurodegeneration in familial chylomicronemia syndrome

2025· article· en· W4410946477 on OpenAlexaff
Raabya Pasha, Anoushka Kamath, Rayaz A. Malik, Robert A. Hegele, Maryam Ferdousi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of clinical lipidology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyBody mass indexEndocrinologyTriglycerideCholesterolCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & Objectives Familial chylomicronaemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder associated with markedly elevated triglyceride concentration and acute pancreatitis, but neuropathic pain and cognitive dysfunction are also increasingly recognised. This study undertook detailed quantification of somatic and autonomic neuropathy in participants with FCS. Methods Sixteen individuals with FCS and sixteen age and sex-matched controls underwent assessment of the lipid profile, neuropathic symptoms and disability, vibration perception, corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and cardiac autonomic reflex testing. Results Age [36.4 (26.5 – 47.2) vs. 36.7 (31.3 – 46.9) years, p = 0.7], gender distribution [males 44% (n=7) vs. 50% (n=8), p = 0.7], body mass index (BMI) (23.7 [20.3-27.1] vs. 24.7 [22.3-27.2] kg/m 2 , p = 0.5), and HbA1c (36.0 [32.5 – 39.2] vs. 36.8 [33.0 – 38.0] mmol/mol, p = 0.9) were comparable between participants with FCS and controls. Triglycerides were significantly higher [23.7 (17.4 – 34.8) vs. 1.0 [0.7 – 1.3) mmol/L, p <0.001), whilst LDL-C [0.9 (0.7 – 1.2) vs. 2.7 (2.3 – 3.1) mmol/L, p <0.001) and HDL-C [0.4 (0.3 – 0.6) vs 1.5 [1.3 – 1.9] mmol/L, p <0.001) were lower in participants with FCS. The Neuropathy Symptom Profile score [4 (0 – 14) vs 0, p =0.003], Neuropathy Disability Score [1 (0 – 3.5) vs 0, p = 0.01] and vibration perception threshold [6.5 (4.7 – 8.1) vs 3.0 (2.0 – 3.5) volts, p <0.001] were higher, whilst corneal nerve fibre density [30.2 (27.3 – 32.3) vs 37.0 (32.5 – 38.5) no./mm 2 , p <0.001], corneal nerve branch density [54.1 (42.0 – 76.6) vs 100.5 (67.0 – 147.1) no./mm 2 , p <0.001], corneal nerve fibre length [20.0 (18.3 – 25.5) vs 27.5 (23.9 – 34.3) mm/mm 2 , p <0.001], deep breathing heart rate variability [17.0 (14.2 – 28.0) vs 29.5 (25.2 – 34.7) beats/min, p =0.002] and E–I ratio [1.18 (1.14 – 1.29) vs 1.36 (1.25 – 1.41), p =0.001] were lower in participants with FCS compared to controls. Conclusion FCS is associated with neuropathic symptoms, elevated vibration perception, small nerve fibre damage and cardiac autonomic dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of clinical lipidologySame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207