Strategi Komunikasi dan Keterlibatan Masyarakat dalam Konservasi Mangrove di Jerowaru, Lombok Timur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mangrove ecosystem plays a vital role in maintaining coastal environmental balance, serving as a natural barrier against abrasion and as a breeding ground for various marine species. However, in many areas—including Jerowaru Village in East Lombok—mangrove degradation occurs due to environmentally harmful human activities and a lack of public awareness regarding the importance of this ecosystem. This study aims to analyze the environmental communication strategies implemented and the extent of community involvement in mangrove conservation efforts in the region. The research employed a qualitative approach, using data collection techniques such as in-depth interviews, field observations, and document studies. The findings indicate that participatory communication involving community leaders, youth groups, and local institutions is more effective in raising awareness and fostering collective action than top-down approaches. The use of traditional media and community discussion forums also plays a significant role in disseminating information and building long-term commitment to conservation. Active community participation not only accelerates the mangrove rehabilitation process but also strengthens a sense of ownership and collective responsibility toward the environment. Thus, participation-based communication strategies are key to ensuring the sustainability of mangrove conservation programs in Jerowaru Village. These findings offer recommendations for policymakers and environmental practitioners to prioritize collaborative approaches in similar coastal programs elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".