MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410953371 · doi:10.3390/mps8030056

Towards Automated Testing of Kynurenine for Point-of-Care Metabolomics

2025· article· en· W4410953371 on OpenAlexafffund
Dipanjan Bhattacharyya, Marcia LeVatte, David S. Wishart

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods and Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGenome Alberta
KeywordsPoint-of-care testingMetabolomicsKynureninePoint of careComputational biologyComputer scienceData scienceChemistryMedicineBiologyChromatographyBiochemistryImmunologyPathologyTryptophan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our objective was to develop a simple, low-cost colorimetric assay to detect kynurenine (L-Kyn) in human biofluids, that would be compatible with a point-of-care (POC) system being developed in our lab. Elevated L-Kyn is associated with many pathological conditions. However, current detection methods are expensive, time-consuming, and unsuitable for resource-limited settings. Existing colorimetric L-Kyn assays lack specificity, require unusual reagents, or lack sensitivity, hindering their practical application. Here we report a two-step diazotization-based colorimetric assay that produces a red chromophore upon reaction with L-Kyn. To reduce background interference, we used dilution and anion exchange chromatography for urine samples and acid precipitation for serum samples. The assay detected 5–300 μM L-Kyn in urine (lower limit of detection (LLOD) 1.34 μM) and 5–125 μM L-Kyn in serum (LLOD 1.24 μM). Correlation studies achieved strong linearity (R2 = 0.98 for spiked urine, 0.99 for spiked serum) and were highly correlated (>0.95) to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) concentrations. Bland–Altman analysis confirmed agreement between L-Kyn assay and LC-MS/MS methods. To our knowledge, this is the first application of a diazotization reaction for L-Kyn quantification at physiologically relevant levels. The assay is now being ported to a low-cost, automated POC biosensor platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods and ProtocolsSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207