Myofibrillar Myopathy: Clinico-Genetic Spectrum From a Neuromuscular Center in South India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Myofibrillar myopathy (MFM) is a group of hereditary neuromuscular disorders with heterogenous manifestations in skeletal and cardiac muscles. Little is known about phenotype-genotype spectrum of MFM in Indian population. This study aims to characterize the clinico-genetic spectrum of 12 MFM ptients from India. METHODS: A detailed description of the clinical, radiological and mutation spectrum of genetically confirmed MFM patients were done. RESULTS: The M:F ratio was 3:1. Median age of onset, presentation and illness duration were 20 (range: birth - 57 years), 31.5 (range: 6-59 years) and 9 (range: 1 - 28 years) years, respectively. Consanguinity was noted in n = 3 (25%) and motor developmental delay in n = 2 (16.7%). Clinical features noted include ptosis (n = 5, 41.7%) and ophthalmoparesis (n = 3, 25%), bifacial weakness (n = 3, 25%), flaccid dysarthria (n = 3, 41.7%), neck weakness (n = 5, 41.7%), limb-girdle weakness (n = 5, 41.7%), foot drop (n = 1, 8.3%), distal upper limb weakness (n = 2, 16.7%), proximo-distal weakness (n = 5, 41.7%), exertional dyspnoea (n = 4, 33.3%) and joint contractures (n = 8, 66.7%). Cardiac involvement (n = 4, 33.3%) including restrictive, dilated, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Median creatine kinase level was 884U/L (range: 347 - 3070 U/L). Muscle biopsy revealed reduced/absent sarcoplasmic desmin expression. Muscle MRI in three patients with predominant fatty infiltration in gluteus maximus and minimus, sartorius, gracilus and semitendinosus in DES; anterior and posterior compartments of distal legs in CRYAB; glutei, hamstrings, adductors of hip and legs with relative sparing of quadriceps, adductor magnus, medial gastrocnemius and peroneal muscles in TTN. Next generation sequencing (NGS) showed the most common gene involved is DES (n = 7, 58.3%) followed by other genes such as HSPB8 (n = 1), FLNC (n = 1), CRYAB (n = 1), LDB3 (n = 1) and TTN (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on clinic-genetic features of MFM from India. The various novel phenotypes noted in our cohort include: CRYAB with late symptom onset without cardiac or bulbar involvement, LDB3 with early onset limb girdle syndrome, ptosis and FLNC with distal myopathy and cardiomyopathy and HSPB8 with limb girdle syndrome and ptosis, further expanding the phenotypic spectrum of MFM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".