MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410956581 · doi:10.47447/tjsm.0860

Trunk muscle endurance and upper extremity performance in healthy adults

2025· article· en· W4410956581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bayram Bilgi, Bihter Akınoğlu, Ayfer Ezgi Yılmaz, Arife Akbulut Bayrak, Salman Usman Shehu, Şeyda Toprak Çelenay

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationTrunkMedicinePhysical therapyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between trunk muscle endurance and upper extremity performance in healthy adult individuals. Materials and Methods: A total of 139 healthy individuals aged between 18-59 were recruited for the study. The McGill Trunk Muscle Endurance Tests, Upper Limb Rotation Test, Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test, and Upper Extremity Y-Balance Test were evaluated to investigate the correlation between trunk muscle endurance and upper extremity performance. Results: A same-directional and low-level relationship was found between upper extremity rotation test scores and extensor endurance and flexor endurance test scores [rs=0.382; rs=0.329; rs=0.244; rs=0.243; (p<0.001)]. A same-directional and moderate relationship was found between upper extremity rotation test scores and flexor endurance, right and left lateral endurance scores [rs=0.446; rs=0.453; rs=0.460; rs=0.476; (p<0.001)]. A direct low level relationship was found between closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test score and trunk endurance test scores [rs=0.265; rs=0.208; rs=0.319; rs=0.359; (p<0.001)]. Also, a same-directional and low-level relationship was found between upper extremity Y-balance test scores and extensor and flexor endurance test scores [rs=0.275; rs=0.232; rs=0.274; rs=0.361; (p<0.001)]. A same-directional and moderate relationship was found between upper extremity Y-balance test scores and right and left lateral endurance test scores [rs=0.460; rs=0.432; rs=0.503; rs=0.455; (p<0.001)]. Conclusions: The results indicate that as trunk muscle endurance improved in healthy adults, there is a linear increase in upper extremity performance. These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of the kinetic chain in movements and the significant relationship between upper extremity and trunk stability. Therefore, this study suggests that to enhance individuals’ upper extremity performance, trunk muscle endurance exercises should take place in training programmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTurkish Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207