Sedimentary fluvial processes at the margin of an eolian sand sea: the example of the Botucatu Formation, Paraná Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous Botucatu Formation of the Paraná Basin consists primarily of trough cross-bedded eolian sandstone deposited in an intracontinental desert. In southeastern Brazil, an unusual occurrence of conglomerate and coarse-grained sandstone unconformably overlies the Neoproterozoic basement and is overlapped by volcanic rocks of the Serra Geral Formation. This represents one of the few documented occurrences of fluvial facies described for the Botucatu Formation in the northern part of the basin. To determine its depositional system and source area, we conducted facies and paleocurrent analysis, detrital grain modal counting, macroscopic provenance, and conventional heavy mineral analysis. The integrated analysis suggests that the studied succession was deposited by an ephemeral fluvial system at the margins of the extensive dune fields of the Botucatu paleodesert. Paleocurrent data and detrital composition indicate sediment dispersal toward the SE, with a possible source area associated with a recycled orogen to the NW (Brasília Belt). Although ephemeral rivers acted as important sediment suppliers for this continental-scale desert, recycling of eolian sediments by fluvial systems is not ruled out. Finally, using a multi-proxy approach, we present a paleogeographic scenario for the northern margin of the Botucatu paleodesert during the last period of Gondwana, prior to its initial rifting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".