MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410969274 · doi:10.3390/recycling10030105

Alkaline Solvothermal Debromination of Commercial Brominated Polystyrene

2025· article· en· W4410969274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecycling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRecycling and Waste Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneChemistryNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Government regulations have required consumer products—electrical and electronic components, toys, furniture, clothing, and cars— to meet ever-increasing flame resistance standards, and industry has met these norms by adding brominated fire retardants. However, end-of-life treatment and up-cycling of these plastics is challenging as the brominated compounds are endocrine disruptors, bioaccumulators, and persist in the environment. Pyrolysis, catalytic cracking, or combustion, to recover its fuel value, produces toxic brominated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans Here, we demonstrated the efficacy of a solvothermal treatment that extracts up to 99% of the bromine from high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) and polystyrene (PS) in electrical and electronic waste (e-waste). The process operated between 160 °C and 230 °C with ethylene glycol or triethylene glycol as the solvent and NaOH or KOH as the extraction agent (0.5 M to 2 M). The reaction rates depended on the particle size: 60 mm plastic chunks took up to between 4 and 24 h to react while fibers 3 mm in diameter reacted in less than 5 min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it