Silk Roads of Pest-Buda: Ottoman Merchants in the Heart of Empire’s Marketplace
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article focuses on the historical contacts between the Habsburg Empire and the Ottoman Empire, with particular emphasis on the Pest-Buda–related mobility and commercial activities of Ottoman subjects during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Through a detailed analysis of three extensive, untapped archival registers from the Finanz- und Hofkammer Archiv in Vienna, the study reveals that Pest-Buda’s crucial role in economic and cultural exchanges between these two empires did not diminish during this period. The research explores the connections between Transylvania and Pest-Buda, highlighting the importance of the Pest-Buda-Transylvania-Ottoman relationship in understanding transimperial communications. By closely examining individual profiles and their mobility patterns, this study not only provides insights into the prevailing socioeconomic circumstances and the interconnected communities moving between the two empires during the period, but also offers a nuanced understanding of Pest-Buda’s role as a historical gateway for Habsburg-Ottoman contacts within the broader imperial context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".