Validation of Virtual Wrist Range of Motion Measurements Using Video Coaching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Wrist range of motion (ROM) is an important assessment in wrist pathology. It is most commonly assessed using a long-arm goniometer. In-person intrarater reliability has been found to be high. Studies evaluating the assessment of wrist ROM virtually are less conclusive. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and intrarater and inter-rater reliability of virtual wrist ROM measurements using a video coaching method. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study assessing wrist flexion, extension, pronation, and supination in healthy volunteers. Three assessors-medical student, research assistant, and upper-extremity surgeon-measured participant wrist ROM at in-person, same-day virtual, and repeat virtual time points, with a 1-week washout period. Measurements were made with a long-arm goniometer. Virtual assessments were performed over Zoom, allowing the assessor to coach volunteers on correct wrist positioning for accurate measurement, using a predefined protocol. Interclass correlation (ICC; 95% confidence intervals) was used to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability between each time point. Results: Fifty-three wrists were enrolled, with complete data available for 45 of them. For all raters and all ROM measures, ICC values for in-person measurements were >0.75, suggesting good inter-rater reliability. This was also seen for same-day and repeat virtual measures for all ROM measurements and raters (ICC >0.75), suggesting similar inter-rater reliability to in-person measurements. Intrarater reliability for in-person, same-day virtual, and repeat virtual was at least good (ICC > 0.75) for all raters and all ROM measurements. Supination had the highest intrarater reliability, with all raters having ICC values graded as excellent (ICC > 0.9). Conclusions: Virtual wrist ROM assessments showed good inter-rater and intrarater reliability, with ICC scores comparable with in-person measures. This was true for raters of all levels of experience. Virtual wrist ROM assessment by this method offers a reliable alternative to in-person assessment. Type of study and level of evidence: Diagnostic IIb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".