MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410984288 · doi:10.1177/10406387251344567

Optimization and validation of ELISAs for interferon-gamma determination in bison

2025· article· en· W4410984288 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Josephine Chileshe, Todd Shury, Jeffrey M. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsGovernment of SaskatchewanGovernment of CanadaParks CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersParks Canada
KeywordsInterferon gammaBiologyBison bisonVirologyGamma interferonImmunologyComputational biologyImmune systemEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bovine tuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium bovis , is endemic in the Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada, home to free-ranging and threatened wood bison. This disease poses a threat to the conservation of this culturally and ecologically important animal species, as well as potentially impacting the health of humans and other animal species via zoonosis and spillover, respectively. The ability to detect infection early will minimize and prevent the potential risk of M. bovis transmission. Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) assays are a reliable detection method for M. bovis in cattle and other wildlife species and may have diagnostic value in bison as well. We aimed to optimize and partially validate 2 commercial IFNγ ELISAs to detect endogenous bison IFNγ in mitogen-stimulated whole blood. Parameters evaluated included antibody identification, sample matrix effect, dilution linearity, assay reproducibility, and limit of quantification. The optimized assays demonstrated linear responses to recombinant bovine and endogenous bison IFNγ (range: 1–125 pg/mL; R 2 = 0.99), with good recovery and fair reproducibility, and a low limit of quantification of 1 pg/mL. Mabtech bovine Flex and Pro kits have the same antibodies but in 2 different assay formats; an in-house assay platform (Flex kit) and precoated plates (Pro kit) are considered suitable for measuring bison IFNγ, offering flexibility depending on available resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic InvestigationSame topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207