MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411002281 · doi:10.1111/ejss.70124

Impact of Agroforestry Types‐Induced Microtopography on Hillslope Erosion in Alpine Canyon Areas

2025· article· en· W4411002281 on OpenAlex
Xiaopeng Shi, Shuqin He, Haiyan Yi, Zicheng Zheng, Ziteng Luo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Research and Development Program of Sichuan ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCanyonErosionGeologyAgroforestryEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)GeomorphologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Surface conditions, including vegetation cover and microtopography, affect soil erosion significantly. However, research on the hydrological processes of different agroforestry types on sloping farmland in southwest alpine canyon regions remains insufficient. The microtopographic evolution of different agroforestry types and a bare slope (CK) was investigated by field‐based in situ scouring experiments. Agroforestry types were divided into Zanthoxylum + Plum + Canadian fleabane (ZPC), Zanthoxylum + Cherry + Artemisia indica (ZCA), Zanthoxylum + Green bean (ZG) and Plum + Soybean (PS). Structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry was used to measure the microtopography of each slope under different scour discharge rates (6, 10 and 14 L·min −1 ). The influence of microtopography on surface runoff and sediment yield was analysed. The results revealed that the ZPC type exhibited the greatest intensity of spatial variation in microtopography, while the PS type showed the smallest. The elevation of each hillslope under different agroforestry types varied from −100 to 100 mm, and the erosion distribution rate accounted for 38.37% to 80.77% of the total. Compared to the pre‐experiment, the variation range of soil surface roughness (SSR), surface cutting depth (SCD), surface relief (SR) and microslope (MS) index were −16.49% to 11.56%, −24.79% to 32.32%, −22.72% to 33.44% and −17.36% to 19.42%, respectively. Under different scour discharge rates, the ZPC type effectively reduced runoff, while the ZCA type significantly decreased sediment yield. At a scour discharge of 14 L·min −1 , the initial runoff production time of the ZCA and ZPC types was significantly delayed compared to that of the CK hillslope, demonstrating a notable runoff reduction benefit. SSR and MS were positively correlated with sediment yield and runoff. SSR can be used to predict runoff and sediment yield in agroforestry areas. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the effective prevention and control of soil loss and the construction of prediction models for sloping farmland in alpine canyon areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it