MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411002370 · doi:10.1186/s12877-025-06057-7

Hypertension and cognitive impairment among older persons in rural Northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4411002370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Izudi, Francis Bajunirwe

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Geriatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsMedicineCross-sectional studyCognitive impairmentRehabilitationGerontologyCognitionRural areaEnvironmental healthPhysical therapyPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is common among older adults and negatively affects cognitive function. Available data on this association is mostly from resource-rich settings and has been understudied in resource-limited settings especially rural areas where the majority of older persons live. We examined the association between hypertension and cognitive impairment in older persons in Kole, a rural district in Uganda, and examined whether sex modifies the association. METHODS: We conducted a community-based cross-sectional study among older persons aged ≥ 60 years in rural northern Uganda, using a multi-stage sampling approach. The primary exposure was hypertension measured by systolic (≥ 140 mmHg) or diastolic blood pressure (≥ 90 mmHg), or being on anti-hypertensive medication. The dichotomous outcome was cognitive impairment determined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores < 26. We used the modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors for the analysis, applying a 5% significance level. RESULTS: We studied 420 participants and found 288 (68.6%) had hypertension while 213 (50.7%) had some cognitive impairment. The overall mean age was 68.4 ± 7.2 years, the mean systolic blood pressure was 138.1 ± 23.1 mmHg while diastolic blood pressure was 85.4 ± 11.9 mmHg, and the mean MOCA score was 17.6 ± 7.2. Hypertension was associated with cognitive impairment (adjusted prevalence risk [aPR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.57), with 4-5 people in the household (aPR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99), no smoking history (aPR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.76), and dissatisfaction with one's health (aPR 1.68, 95% CI 1.27-2.21) and satisfaction with the ability to perform usual domestic duties (aPR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) being associated. In a sex-stratified analysis, men with hypertension were more likely to experience cognitive impairment (aPR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.40), compared to those with normal blood pressure but there was no significant association among women (aPR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-1.24). CONCLUSION: Older persons with hypertension were more likely to experience cognitive impairment than those without. In a sex stratied analysis, this observation persists among men but disappears among women. Our results suggest a need to raise awareness and consider regular blood pressure measurement and control in older adults. We recommend longitudinal studies to examine temporality and suggest blood pressure interventions to prevent cognitive impairment in older age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC GeriatricsSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207