Thermodynamics-informed machine learning for predicting temperature-dependent chemical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging energy and electronic systems rely on the thermodynamic properties of chemical and cooling fluids. These properties are a function of both chemical structure and temperature. For instance, the dynamic viscosity of a fluid can vary by orders of magnitude across the operating range of a cooling system. However, capturing this behavior remains a challenge for experimental and modelling approaches. Machine learning models, although powerful for fixed temperatures, fail to generalize across temperatures due to a lack of data and a lack of embedded physical constraints. Here, we introduce a thermodynamics-informed machine learning framework that incorporates established physical relationships, such as the Arrhenius equation, to capture both chemical diversity and temperature dependence. We show that decoupling chemistry from thermodynamic conditions enables accurate prediction of temperature-dependent dynamic viscosity, which we validated experimentally. Through a materials-discovery campaign for cooling applications, we show that neglecting temperature effects can cause over 90% errors in performance evaluation, leading to inaccurate materials ranking and suboptimal fluid selection. Finally, we extend the framework to other properties, such as vapor pressure and diffusion coefficient, highlighting a generalizable strategy for accelerating fluid property prediction and design for sustainable technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".