MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411020296 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.02.657339

Underappreciated role of environmental enrichment in alleviating depression and anxiety: Quantitative evidence synthesis of rodent models

2025· preprint· en· W4411020296 on OpenAlexafffund
Yefeng Yang, Manman Liu, Kyle Morrison, Malgorzata Lagisz, Shinichi Nakagawa

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustralian Research CouncilCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsDepression (economics)AnxietyRodentPsychologyRodent modelEnvironmental enrichmentNeurosciencePsychiatryBiologyEcologyMedicineInternal medicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Environmental enrichment has long been recognized as a non-pharmacological intervention to mitigate mental health issues, yet its efficacy, and heterogeneity of treatment effects across experimental contexts remain underexplored. Heterogeneity of treatment effects, which reflects variability in individual responses to interventions, is a critical factor in determining the generalizability and personalization needs of treatments. Here, we conducted a registered meta-analysis of 62 studies and 1,112 comparisons in rodent models to evaluate the impact of environmental enrichment on depressive and anxiety-like behaviours. We found that environmental enrichment reduced these behaviours of animal models by 16% on average and decreased inter-individual variability by 12%, indicating not only effectiveness but also low heterogeneity of treatment effects, which suggests consistent effects across individuals. Environmental enrichment further nullified the adverse effects of stressors, demonstrating a significant antagonistic interaction. These effects were robust across multiple sensitivity analyses, including model-based predictions, post-stratification, multi-model inference, publication bias correction, and critical appraisal of study quality. Moderator analyses highlighted the importance of exposure timing and the inclusion of social enrichment components. Taken together, our pre-clinical evidence on rodent models supports environmental enrichment as a low-cost, scalable, and biologically grounded intervention with translational relevance for developing equitable and accessible treatments for depression and anxiety. Given the importance of innovation and personalization in mental health care, the low heterogeneity of treatment effects of environmental enrichment positions it as a promising avenue for non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies that can be broadly applied without extensive tailoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.063
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.125
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0630.125
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.016
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicStress Responses and Cortisol→French-language works237,207→