MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411022211 · doi:10.1167/iovs.66.6.19

Expansion of the <i>ABCA4</i>-Associated Retinopathy Spectrum: Severe Variants Can be Associated With Early-Onset Severe Retinal Dystrophy

2025· article· en· W4411022211 on OpenAlexafffund
Daan M. Panneman, Rebekkah J. Hitti‐Malin, Martin McKibbin, Suzanne E. de Bruijn, Erica G. M. Boonen, Andrea L. Vincent, G. Valenzuela Vargas, Jordi Corominas, Galuh Astuti, Christian Gilissen, Chris F. Inglehearn, Susanne Roosing, Robert K. Koenekoop, Frans P.M. Cremers

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersOogfondsRetina UKCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCure KidsHealth Research Charities IrelandEberhard Karls Universität TübingenFight for Sight UKNational Institutes of HealthChildren's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsABCA4OphthalmologyMedicineRetinalRetinopathyMacular dystrophyDystrophyBiologyGeneticsPathologyEndocrinologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) are inherited retinal diseases that are characterized by severe visual loss very early in life. Whereas LCA is characterized by loss of vision in the first year of life, nystagmus, and absent or abnormal electrical signals on electroretinogram, persons with EOSRD show onset of disease between 1 and 5 years of age, with better preserved visual acuity and some signals on an electroretinogram. We investigated the genetic cause of disease and clinical characteristics in three probands with EOSRD. Methods: All patients were examined by at least two ophthalmologists to reach a clinical diagnosis. APEX microarray screening, smMIP-based sequencing, and whole exome and whole genome sequencing were used to obtain a genetic diagnosis and investigate potential modifiers. Results: The EOSRD phenotype of these three probands was established through ophthalmological investigation. Biallelic severe ABCA4 variants were identified after the phenotypic diagnosis of EOSRD in these probands. We then asked whether additional gene defects may be involved and worsen the phenotype. Through whole genome sequencing we identified two NBAS variants in patient 1 and a well-known homozygous, hypomorphic missense variant in CNGB3 in patient 3. Conclusions: We propose that biallelic severe ABCA4 variants can be implicated in EOSRD. We hypothesize that the ABCA4 and CNGB3 variants could have an additive effect given the colocalization of the encoded proteins in cone photoreceptors cell membranes. Whether the CNGB3 and NBAS variants play a modifying role remains to be investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207