MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411024572 · doi:10.58286/31374

Improved Evaluation of Bender Element Testing for Different Confinement Stress Levels

2025· article· en· W4411024572 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Journal of Nondestructive Testing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Element (criminal law)Materials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate material characterization over time is crucial for the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of energy and environmental projects, as well as infrastructure resilience. This is particularly important in nuclear power plants and energy geo-structures. The Bender Element (BE) test is a non-destructive technique (NDT) used to assess small-strain properties of materials, including Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) and Shear Modulus (Gmax). BEs, made of piezoelectric materials, operate by applying an excitation voltage to a transmitter (Tx), generating shear waves that propagate through a specimen and are detected by a receiver (Rx). Small-strain properties are determined from the computed Vs. Despite standardized guidelines (e.g., ASTM D8295-19) and widespread BE applications in soil characterization, challenges persist in implementation and data interpretation. A major issue is the accurate determination of S-wave arrival time, often complicated by interference from P-waves and reflected waves, leading to measurement inaccuracies. A key knowledge gap exists in understanding BE interactions with different materials under varying confinement stresses. This research evaluates BE behavior under diverse conditions, proposing alternative methods to verify Vs measurements. The study comprises three phases: experimental testing, numerical modeling, and theoretical equation evaluation. BE lab tests were conducted using transparent soil under varying confinement stress, incorporating laser vibrometry to measure displacements on BE plates despite surrounding soil. Signal responses were analyzed in both time and frequency domains. Numerical modeling employs a novel finite difference simulation in FLAC3D (Itasca 2023), calibrated with experimental results. Additionally, the standard equation for BE resonant frequency prediction was assessed, considering confinement effects on system stiffness. The Hilbert Transform was applied to evaluate instantaneous frequency responses. The proposed method introduces new approaches for selecting S-wave arrival time, incorporating BE resonant frequency and time-domain frequency analysis. These findings enhance understanding of BE-sample interactions, improving the interpretation of BE test results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it