MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411024572 · doi:10.58286/31374

Improved Evaluation of Bender Element Testing for Different Confinement Stress Levels

2025· article· en· W4411024572 on OpenAlexaff
Chehem Vargas-Neuville, Kamelia Atefi‐Monfared, Giovanni Cascante

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Journal of Nondestructive Testing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Element (criminal law)Materials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate material characterization over time is crucial for the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of energy and environmental projects, as well as infrastructure resilience. This is particularly important in nuclear power plants and energy geo-structures. The Bender Element (BE) test is a non-destructive technique (NDT) used to assess small-strain properties of materials, including Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) and Shear Modulus (Gmax). BEs, made of piezoelectric materials, operate by applying an excitation voltage to a transmitter (Tx), generating shear waves that propagate through a specimen and are detected by a receiver (Rx). Small-strain properties are determined from the computed Vs. Despite standardized guidelines (e.g., ASTM D8295-19) and widespread BE applications in soil characterization, challenges persist in implementation and data interpretation. A major issue is the accurate determination of S-wave arrival time, often complicated by interference from P-waves and reflected waves, leading to measurement inaccuracies. A key knowledge gap exists in understanding BE interactions with different materials under varying confinement stresses. This research evaluates BE behavior under diverse conditions, proposing alternative methods to verify Vs measurements. The study comprises three phases: experimental testing, numerical modeling, and theoretical equation evaluation. BE lab tests were conducted using transparent soil under varying confinement stress, incorporating laser vibrometry to measure displacements on BE plates despite surrounding soil. Signal responses were analyzed in both time and frequency domains. Numerical modeling employs a novel finite difference simulation in FLAC3D (Itasca 2023), calibrated with experimental results. Additionally, the standard equation for BE resonant frequency prediction was assessed, considering confinement effects on system stiffness. The Hilbert Transform was applied to evaluate instantaneous frequency responses. The proposed method introduces new approaches for selecting S-wave arrival time, incorporating BE resonant frequency and time-domain frequency analysis. These findings enhance understanding of BE-sample interactions, improving the interpretation of BE test results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-Journal of Nondestructive TestingSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207