MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411037154 · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2025.05.002

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Anemia in Radical Cystectomy Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

2025· article· en· W4411037154 on OpenAlex
Ernest Kaufmann, Luca Antonelli, Luca Afferi, Vincenzo Asero, Francesco Prata, Silvia Rebuffo, Alessandro Veccia, Meftun Çulpan, Karl H. Tully, Luis Ribeiro, Thierry Roumeguère, Kees Hendricksen, Luca Lambertini, Renate Pichler, Nicola Pavan, Jeremy Yuen‐Chun Teoh, M. Roumiguié, Gerald Bastian Schulz, Francesco Soria, Aamer Alghamlas, Luca Orecchia, Cédric Poyet, Majed Alrumayyan, Michael Rink, Stefania Zamboni, María Riaza Montes, Steven Okoye, Mattia Lo Re, Wojciech Krajewski, Luke T. Lavallée, Marian S. Wettstein, Marco Moschini, Christian D. Fankhauser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersHochschule Luzern
KeywordsCystectomyObservational studyMedicineAnemiaRetrospective cohort studyMulticenter studyGeneral surgerySurgeryInternal medicineBladder cancerRandomized controlled trialCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective Preoperative anemia is common in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, but its prevalence and impact on outcomes remain poorly characterized across different health care settings. This study aims to assess the prevalence of preoperative anemia, evaluate its current management practices, and determine its association with postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 4886 patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy across 28 centers in 13 countries. Multivariable regression models identified the predictors of preoperative hemoglobin levels and postoperative blood transfusions. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Key findings and limitations Preoperative anemia was present in 44% of women and 48% of men. Among anemic patients, 73% received no blood management interventions. Higher hemoglobin levels before transurethral resection of a bladder tumor correlated with higher levels before cystectomy and fewer postoperative blood transfusions (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97–0.99, p < 0.001). Higher preoperative hemoglobin levels were associated with lower 90-d mortality rates (hazard ratio: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99, p < 0.001) and independently predicted reduced all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and disease relapse. Conclusions and clinical implications Preoperative anemia is prevalent and undertreated in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, and is independently associated with adverse perioperative and oncological outcomes. This highlights the need for further research regarding the potential benefits of implementing systematic preoperative anemia management. Patient summary This study found that low blood counts before bladder removal surgery are common, often untreated, and linked to worse outcomes. Early treatment of low blood counts before surgery could improve results for patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it