Numerical simulation of a continuous sonoreactor for cotton cellulose residues recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerical simulations are a tool for sonoreactors design and reaction parameters choice. We modeled a two parts sonoreactor with six lateral flat transducers along the walls and a concentric high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) transducer at the bottom. We examined the effects of the gap between the reflector and transducers ( h ), cone radii in the lower part and ultrasound frequency ( f ) on the cavitation activity of cellulose esters solutions. Then, we investigated the effects of the properties of cellulose solutions on the cavitation activity The simulation accounts for the attenuation due to the cavitation bubbles and considers the propagation of sound waves from the HIFU as linear. We measured the speed of sound in the cellulose esters solutions and included it in our simulations: 1545 m s −1 for 6.25 g L -1 . h , f , the density ( ρ ) and the viscosity ( μ ) of the cellulose solutions have the most significant effects − accounting for 34 % to 61 % of the variance − on the total acoustic pressure ( p T ) and active cavitation surface area ( V ). p T and V increase as f and ρ increase, and as h and μ decrease. At 78 kHz and h = 0.075 m, with μ = 5.3 × 10 -3 Pa.s and ρ = 941.8 kg m −3 , the simulation resulted in the highest p T and largest V : 1.96 × 10 6 Pa and 3.99 × 10 −2 m 2 . These data provide a basis to optimize sonoreactor design and operating conditions for enhanced cavitation performance in cellulose processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".