MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411044709 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.04.657855

Alterations in auditory midbrain processing is observed in both female and male mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome

2025· preprint· en· W4411044709 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdullah Abdullah, Xiuping Liu, Kartikeya Murari, Jun Yan, Ning Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteFRAXA Research Foundation
KeywordsMidbrainFragile X syndromeFragile xAudiologyNeuroscienceBiologyPsychologyMedicineGeneticsCentral nervous systemGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sensory processing deficits presenting as auditory hypersensitivity is a common phenotype associated with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), a leading monogenic cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Auditory hypersensitivity can also be observed in the FMR1- knockout (KO) mice, a well-established mouse model of autism and FXS. FXS is an X-linked disorder that is more prevalent in males compared to females, as a result most auditory and electrophysiology studies are performed in males. Previous in-vivo electrophysiology studies at the inferior colliculus (IC), an essential component of the auditory pathway, in male FMR1- KO mice at post-natal days 14, 21 and 34 (P14, P21 and P34) demonstrated increased neuronal firing, suggesting that the IC could play a role in auditory hypersensitivity. However, very little is known about the role of the central nucleus of the IC (ICc) and auditory hypersensitivity in females. Methods Here we investigated auditory processing at P20 and P30, representative of early and late developmental stage of auditory development, respectively, at the central nucleus of the IC (ICc) of both female and male FMR1- KO mice, compared with wildtype (WT) animals. Results In-vivo electrophysiology recordings from the ICc neurons of the FMR1- KO mice at both developmental ages demonstrated increased response magnitude measured by spike number to pure tones of varying frequency and amplitude, compared with age- and sex-matched WT animals. In addition, within the FMR1- KO group we also observed significant developmental and sex difference wherein higher response magnitudes were displayed at P20 and in the female mice. Minimum threshold of ICc neuron in the KO mice was significantly decreased at both P20 and P30. The ICc neurons in the KO mice also displayed increased response duration compared to WT animals at both P20 and P30, but significant sex difference was only observed at P30. Our data also indicated that the ICc neurons of both groups displayed weak negative relationship between latency and response magnitude at P20, and at P30 the WT mice showed a stronger relationship only in the female group. In terms of developmental changes, we observed decreasing neuronal firing only in the KO mice between 20- and 30-day old female and male mice. Reduced response duration was observed in 30-day old mice of both sexes of both genotypes. Regarding minimum threshold, we observed a decline between early and late auditory development only in the male mice. Finally, our results also indicated that in the WT mice the reverse relationship between latency and response magnitude became more pronounced and consistent with age, a developmental trend that was absent in both the female and male FMR1 -KO mice. Discussion Overall, our findings demonstrate that auditory processing deficits can also be observed in the female FMR1 -KO mice using in-vivo electrophysiology studies, highlighting the importance of including female subjects in future studies. These results also indicate that auditory hypersensitivity can be observed robustly in younger mice, suggesting that the early development stage could be an ideal target for interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207