MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411045183 · doi:10.1002/smll.202504893

Inhibiting Phase Transitions of Prussian Blue Analogs with High‐Entropy Strategy for Ultralong‐Life Sodium‐Ion Battery Cathodes

2025· article· en· W4411045183 on OpenAlexaff
Shuhui Liu, Haixia Yu, Yüe Zhao, Jiaxiang Sun, Yan He, Dingding Zhu, Shucheng Xu, Yunzhi Yang, Sen Tong, Runyu Zhang, Guihuan Chen, Qiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPrussian blueMaterials scienceElectrochemistryCathodeEntropy (arrow of time)IonElectrochemical energy storagePhase transitionNanotechnologyChemical physicsConductivityChemical engineeringElectrodeThermodynamicsChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prussian blue analogs (PBAs) have garnered considerable attention due to open 3D framework and high theoretical capacity. However, unfavorable phase transitions and inherent low conductivity lead to severe capacity decay and poor rate performance. Herein, the high‐entropy (HE) concept is incorporated into PBAs to improve their electrochemical properties. By introducing four inert elements sharing N coordination site with Fe, the high‐entropy Na x (FeCuNiMgZn)[Fe(CN) 6 ] (HEPBA) is constructed. The developed high‐entropy Prussian blue analog (HEPBA) exhibits high specific capacity with cyclic stability, stable operation 2000 cycles at 1C, and superior rate performance. Experimental results and theoretical calculations demonstrate that this high‐entropy design not only effectively inhibits phase transitions and reinforces structural stability but also activates the redox activity of low‐spin‐state Fe centers. Simultaneously, it can improve sodium‐ion diffusion by optimizing pathways and reducing energy barriers, ultimately enhancing overall performance. This strategy provides an innovative perspective that synergistically optimizes specific capacity, structural stability, and rate performance in PBAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207